TRANSEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, TRANSHUMAN.( Dispatches from the 11th Hour) by Jennifer Bilek. Reflections by Joan Ginsberg.

HOW DID WE GET HERE WITHOUT ALARM BELLS ?

To those of us who had not been paying attention (such as myself), the sudden explosion of transgenderism in recent years at first seemed   baffling in the extreme. It evolved from being a side -issue that was easily ignored into a much bigger beast that appeared to have teeth, claws and a roar. Many of us were familiar with certain celebrities in the creative arts who had chosen to live their life as a person of the opposite sex over the decades. For myself, it was people like Jan Morris, the popular travel writer, who came to mind. Then, I remembered   Radclyffe Hall who was a lesbian writer of a previous generation to Morris who attracted criticism and legal proceedings for the publication of her book “The Well of Loneliness”. I have read it, expecting some blue scenes, but there were none.  Unlike Morris, she did not attempt to change biological sex but did choose to dress as a man. Any other names from the 1900’s would have escaped me, despite having researched some of them. I suppose like many others I didn’t think that they were particularly relevant to my life and regarded their “oddities” as a personal struggle between their interior self and the world they inhabited, rather than as a cultural phenomenon that demanded public recognition, the cry of an oppressed minority.  I sympathised with their predicament but never thought that they represented a huge army of people.  

However, by now, in the 21st century, the picture is a very different one and I can think of dozens of examples of such people in so many areas of public life; actors, actors’ children, politicians, academics, sportspeople, teachers etc. who claim to be either transgender or gender fluid. Grayson Perry, the transvestite artist, has chosen to go loud and brash with his fetish, and doesn’t hide his belief in the concept of “gender performativity” as a harmful element in the behaviour of men. At one time I would have celebrated his eccentric character and his apparently working-class charm. By now however, he rings alarm bells. He is a quirky, blokey, bubbly.” rebel”, a mere “Wikipedia scholar” as he puts it, who is fully embedded in the British Establishment and seems quite relaxed with that as almost a rite of passage famous people have to go through. 

The button below is a video of him detailing some of the life events that set him on his course of overt transvestitism. Note  that he claims that” risk is a big aphrodisiac”.

Click Me

He is pictured below, after being awarded his medal as Knight Bachelor in Windsor castle. 

Then we see the 23-year-old, then newly elected mayor of Bangor, Owen Hercum.  He is just one of a number of young mayors that have been given this responsibility despite their tender years. Others include Faisal Hussain, at the age of 29 in Stoke-on-Trent, Ryan Murphy, at the age of 29 in Belfast, and the youngest Westminster mayor on record, Hamza Taozzale at age 22. Am I alone in thinking this trend strange?   It seems that we are living in an age where inexperience is a virtue and where children and young adults are being taken for prophets and sages regardless of their lack of expertise. A prominent example would be Greta Thunberg who was allowed to criticise state leaders openly whilst commanding huge audiences despite still being a schoolgirl.

THE RISE OF GENDER IDEOLOGY.

This creeping empowerment of youthful enthusiasm unaccompanied by life credentials presents its own dangers. Just how young will these influencers become? We only need to look at who kids are watching on YouTube to realise that children are leading children. This strange empowerment of children can lead to conflict in the family, where the expectations of the child outweigh the possibilities on offer to them. This has   been accompanied by a tandem movement in politics and many other areas, as we will see, to undermine the traditional concept of a woman as a life-giving force, as the sole barer of children. The by now outdated, analogue version of parenthood, whereby it is the man who inseminates, and the woman who carries and nurtures that seed, has become redundant. It had always been so simple—until now.  

Instead of being a miraculous vessel for new life, a woman was having to join the virtual queue of “chest feeders”, ” people with a uterus”, “people with a cervix” and “menstruaters”  in order to validate herself, despite never having encountered a man with a penis and a uterus, who happened to be heavy with child, at her ante- natal clinic. Just where are these people who need protecting from words that might trigger them, and who claim to be a large community?  Do they even exist at all or are they a figment of a desperately overheated corporate imagination? Has this recent re-interpretation of human rights become a net to ensnare us, by demanding we uphold the values of people who might or might not be faking it, whilst surrendering our own? All these “be kind” sentiments are being reiterated by the rhetoric of politicians and councillors, the policies of governing bodies of universities, schools, the NHS, HM prison services, the Police force the media,  --the list is exhaustingly long. Below is a screen shot of Gwynedd  Plaid Cymru councillors displaying ande waving trans flags. The Nolan Principles seem to be discarded in favour of the “trans community” of Gwynedd, which according to their stats,” make up just the proportion who identify as a trans man, trans woman and every other gender is the same as for the north (0.1% each).”

 Gender Ideology has come of age and has received the seal of approval from primary to higher- tier education.  Stonewall and GIRES have been throbbing with activity. Suddenly, Pride became a month-long event that was impossible to miss in any town centre, where shops and public places became festooned with LGBTQIA paraphernalia. Drag queens, after years struggling in cabaret and fringe shows, were suddenly exalted to roles of authors and influencers And who would blame them for accepting such gigs when they had policemen chauffeuring them to venues where the audience was hardly likely to be a tough one.  Pre-school children don’t tend to be overly demanding or discriminating as an audience, unlike those at a working men’s club could be for budding entertainers where ruthlessness often prevailed.

We were no longer asked to be kind to trans individuals; it was required behaviour since repercussions could and would follow if we were not. Owen Hercum would be an example of a young “them” being terribly distressed at the words of Senedd member, Helen Mary Jones for being hateful enough to make tweets such as "Gender critical feminists are not attacking trans people. We are asking questions." Her behaviour caused the young Hercum to resign as a candidate for Plaid Cymru, and his concerns were supported by the then leader of Plaid, Adam Price. He said Plaid had a "very clear policy in favour of trans equality and indeed our manifesto will have the most radical commitment ever in achieving trans equality". ( It seems that Hercum, having left his mayoral post early, is  now studying for a PhD  in Transgender Archaeology at the University of York). Anyone who showed reservations about endorsing the invasive behaviour of grown men in frocks was immediately classed as a hateful bigot. Womanhood was being defined in terms of interchangeable body parts that females might or might not have and which could miraculously be shared by men, who, likewise, might or might not have them. We were all suddenly reduced to Minecraft skins simply because, according to the men in white coats, “gender is assigned at birth” rather than observed and stated, as it was in saner days.  Politicians instantly became trembling heaps when asked to define what a woman really was. As you can see in this video clip, Keir Starmer gets into quite a pickle about who might own a cervix. 

Click Me

Nigel Thorne delivers some stark revelations about many of the main and  satellite characters involved in the Welsh  RSE curriculum and its implementation, directly or indirectly, and I would urge everyone to investigate his channel. Be prepared for quite a bumpy road at times since some of the stones he upturns reveal some hideous creatures beneath.

WHERE BILEK’S RESEARCH  DIFFERS.

 Meanwhile, Bilek took a less obvious path and went straight to the financial head of the hydra—the transgender industry, and the kind of players involved in its emergence. So far, she is the only person I’ve come across providing this type of research, although I stand open to correction on that point. Since she is American, many of the names she reveals will not necessarily be familiar to a UK readership, but during the series of essays in this book, the reader comes to understand the profound social , ideological and medical harm that these massively influential characters, NGO’s and corporations  are unleashing on the world whilst the public , by and large,  remains asleep at the wheel, oblivious to its implications for not only society as we know it, but also humanity itself  . She reveals the magnitude of their global influence and the kind of mindsets they possess which allow them to commit profound injury to mostly young and underdeveloped minds and bodies.  Not alone do we have these obvious, present evils whereby children are actively encouraged to question their own gender by virtue of an RSE/PSHE etc., curriculum (cause and effect anyone?); we face the prospect of a future we may not recognise or want which is hurtling towards us faster than “the speed of science”.   She tracks the way that ESG (Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance) together with DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) have been promoted to the point where they have hijacked many governments across the globe. She writes,

“In less than 20 years, the ESG/DEI movement has grown from a corporate social responsibility initiative launched by the UN into a global phenomenon representing more than $30 trillion in assets under management. It basically hands over social and political responsibility to oligarchs, corporatists, and financial assets management firms like Ernst & Young and BlackRock which invest in the future equality and sustainability goals of what they hope will become a global society, with homogenized virtues, ethics, goals and initiatives. This process usurps the power of people to create culture and society through governance and the election of officials that speak and act for the citizens of the world’s many diverse populations…. The ESG and DEI policies have morphed into a global agenda known as the UN Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) “

A little later in the introduction, she catalogues how this was allowed to happen. It seems that it was around 2014 when the term “transgender” was fully launched onto American culture when “”a coalition of concerned human rights organizations working to counter the exclusion of persons due to real or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, and bodily diversity” petitioned for a seat at the SDG UN table, with their SDG Zero Draft Outcome Document. “ She highlights the way that “bodily diversity” is by now “the key component of all the current discussions of gender bills, laws and expression.” She asserts, quite rightly, that the promotion of bodily diversity through gender “manifests the illusion of another type of person, beyond the realms of our reproductive sex, and thereby our humanity” Already we are glimpsing the chilling possibilities embedded in the prefix “trans” as implied by the title of the book. Will our already traumatised minds even notice when the leap from transgender to transhuman becomes a talking point amongst us? As this author, together with others points out, we are being slowly asphyxiated, emasculated, de-feminised and de-humanised by the very human rights laws that should be designed to protect us. The next hot question has to be, not “what is a woman?” but rather, “what is a human?” If only it stopped at the first question, maybe we might stand a chance of asserting our sovereign human rights. For the moment, it appears that the kickback on this front has made an important step forward , judging from news reports as recent as this week. How significant it really is will be hard to know, because the tone of this article suggests that Pandora’s little gender fairy will not be going back into the box any time soon.

BIONIC WARFARE  ANYONE?

Or are we all going to turn into a nation of bionic soldiers? By way of a small digression, I found that if you type Gov.uk transhumanism into a search engine—this is an option that appears. Make of it what you will. Even without reading far into the text, we can see the adoption of “human augmentation” as they call it, is going to change US and hence humanity. Rather in the same way that Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum claims that the 4th Industrial Revolution will change what it means to be a human. 

Click Me

And all this hot on the tail of our transgender trauma -burger that we are still trying to digest.

GLOBALIST BUSINESS PROMOTES MIXED SEX TOILETS IN SCHOOLS.

Bilek does not venture too far down the transhumanist road. As she has stated in interviews, that is not her specialist subject but is one she knows we must fear and be very vigilant of. Some of the characters she unveils are heavily invested in AI and the possibilities of the flesh merging with technology, so that alone illustrates the point of the book title. Furthermore, she does convey some astonishing insights into the corporate world. This example is a prime one, considering we are talking about universal toilets which have created great controversy in general, most especially in schools. Whilst many parents were irate with heads of schools, councils, governors, institutions etc. (and quite rightly) for implementing such policies and unnecessarily re-allocating public money in many cases, how many had a smidgeon of an idea about this information from Bilek? It is a lengthy, but very revealing quote, illustrating the wall of chicanery that protects this industry. For those who, like me, were not sure of the term “amicus brief”, below is a link to its definition. 

Click Me

.

“Along with support by pharmaceutical giants such as Janssen Therapeutics, Johnson & Johnson, Viiv, Pfizer, Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, major technology corporations including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Intel, Dell, and IBM are also funding the transgender project. In February 2017, Apple, Microsoft, Google, IBM, Yelp, PayPal, and 53 other, mostly tech corporations signed onto an amicus brief pushing the Supreme Court to prohibit schools from keeping private facilities for students designated according to sex. “

As Bilek says “Why do they care? The obvious answer is money.” Furthermore, many of the above funders are invested in the technologies of assisted reproduction which is ironic considering they are investing also in the sterilisation of children.  Take Amazon for example, that launched its first fertility clinic in 2019.Meanwhile, in 2021, the Bezos family invested $166 million in a hospital offering “gender services” to youth in Brooklyn. The owner of Time , Marc Benioff, likes to double his odds via a company of which he is a CEO and co-founder, Salesforce, which not only pioneers cloud computing, but also funds clinics to medicalise children’s natural puberty, whilst simultaneously investing in Overture Life, an embryology laboratory. He is obviously a man who appreciates extremes—like buttering your bread on both sides.  

Pictured above, are just two of the major characters on whom Bilek sheds light on frequent occasions.

BINA AND MARTINE ROTHBLATT: WIVES FOR LIFE.

Rothblatt (, who became Bina ‘s husband in1992 and had two children with her, but became a “woman” in 1994) has an impressive c.v. It would seem that his wealth has increased substantially since this article was written and is estimated to be over $1billion by now. He seems to have an ideal marriage to the point where he and his wife wish to be eternally bonded in a novel way—an AI way which will reproduce Bina’s conscious thoughts and personality digitally, via a  robot in her image and  cloud storage of her many utterances. This invention is named Bina48. Bina48 might look rather primitive and almost comical in appearance, but there is no humour behind the words of Martine when he states;

 “It is merely a matter of decades before symbol-association software achieves the complexity of human thought and emotion (i.e. mindware) and converges with the information billions are already engaged in compiling (i.e. mindclones) This is real intelligent design.”

My question, as I imagine yours would be also, is—who are these billions of people engaged in compiling this required information? We can only guess, because of the sheer numbers, that it must be the population of the world, innocently using their mobile phones whilst being harvested for data. Rothblatt ‘s stellar credentials in Law,  meant that he was a member of the International Conference on Transgender Law and Employment Policy since 1992. After meeting another transgender lawyer, Phyllis Frye (dubbed the “grandmother of the transgender movement) he drafted a document later referred to as the International Bill of Gender Rights.. Bilek says the following about their encounter - “ This small meeting of men with a penchant for wearing women’s undergarments was the launchpad for an international project to drive transsexualism globally and deconstruct sexual dimorphism Rothblatt also invented a foundation called Terasem, a philosophical/semi-religious organisation that seems to worship the potential of AI rather than an omniscient God. 

Jennifer Bilek opens a pop-up book of star players in the Pharmaceutical industry and beyond, that demands examination. Such characters as the “transwoman” Jennifer Pritzker and his ridiculously wealthy, and highly influential family.  One of his strategies, which his family shares, is to fund hospitals and universities. One such hospital is the Lurie Children’s Hospital for gender non-conforming children in Chicago, the city which also houses the Pritzker School of Medicine at the university. The first chair of transgender studies at the University of Victoria in Canada. was also funded by him. Students whom he funds become beholden to him and  go on to propagate his (and his family’s) ideology by writing pro trans articles in medical journals and elsewhere.

The Stryker family is another massive source of funding, through their Arcus Foundation, a non-profit organisation serving the LGBT “community”.  Apparently, Jon Stryker alone has given more than $58.4 million to LGBT causes during 2007 and 2010 .   The Stryker family deserves a blog of its own.

In conclusion the cultural landscape appears very different to how it did even 10 years ago. By now we can begin to understand much better, why we feel that there has been a landslide of attitudes and policies that we found so confusing. Why trans ideology has become the contentious subject that we can no longer ignore. And why the least able to defend themselves from this ideology were the first to become ensnared., i.e. the children who have a lifetime ahead of them to be preyed upon and exploited spiritually, physically and financially by globalist pirates. During this journey, social behaviour and acceptance of lower standards in science, ethics, arts, music and literature were the first casualties, in order to prime the adults to be the Pied Piper instead of the mentor to our children. If we don’t re-assess our relationship with children, and the future we want for them, perhaps it will be too late to abandon the technology that has brought us to this crucial point in our history. As Bilek states;

“Our youth are being sexually traumatised because the most common response to sexual trauma is body dissociation. They are being bombarded with sexually violent images via internet porn, where they are observers and coerced into performing on tech platforms. “Trans” cartoon characters sing to them from their childhood programs sporting double mastectomy scars, and sexually explicit material is seeping into their classrooms. They spend more and more time online , just like the adults surrounding them , oblivious of the high-tech marketing and propaganda they are exposed  to ….

Finally, I will end on words from Bilek’s own conclusion to her work which sum up the essence of her mission in writing these essays. Words which, sadly, I can only concur with.

“Every action against the gender industry is vital, but the most important aspect of resistance is to let go of the illusion that there is another type of human outside the borders of our sexed species, or that there is a coherent group of individuals that warrants the kind of attack on humanity , society and reality, like the one we are witnessing. We have been pummelled for a decade with high tech propaganda claiming that a suffering group needs us. It is an illusion.

It is terrifying to contemplate what losing this battle will mean, and it is just as frightening to contemplate acting against the gender industry as it becomes increasingly more totalitarian. It seems insurmountable and, the truth be told, it may be. But freedom is worth fighting for Fighting against a technocratic assault on children’s reproductive organs and their minds , so they may have a future as part of the natural world, is everything. Silence is no longer acceptable."